{"id":1145,"date":"2026-07-30T17:44:57","date_gmt":"2026-07-30T17:44:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145"},"modified":"2026-07-30T17:44:57","modified_gmt":"2026-07-30T17:44:57","slug":"the-accidental-architect-of-the-internets-brain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145","title":{"rendered":"The Accidental Architect of the Internet\u2019s Brain"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Steven Pruitt spends his evenings identifying errors that most people never notice and making fixes that hardly anyone ever thanks him for. He toils at a desk in a town house in Alexandria, Virginia, surrounded by books\u2014the kind of working clutter that suggests a long relationship with paper rather than a fetish for screens. And yet his work is necessarily digital; after dinner, and sometimes late into the night, he uses his desktop computer to correct dates, clean up syntax, standardize categories, and occasionally write entire biographies of people on Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia.<\/p>\n

Read more Inside OpenAI\u2019s Hack of Hugging Face<\/a><\/p>\n

Wikipedia is not his employer, of course. Like all editors on the site, Pruitt is a volunteer. \u201cAt this point, I won\u2019t say I don\u2019t have any skin in the game,\u201d he told me. \u201cBut it\u2019s a lot lower stakes than a job because if I get something wrong, it\u2019s fairly easy to fix it. I can fix it myself. I can do what I want to do on my own time.\u201d Still, he holds himself to some rules: \u201cI do try to get in at least one edit a day.\u201d<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Pruitt is forty-two, and works full time as a records-management contractor for the federal government. After graduating from the College of William & Mary, in 2006, he moved back in with his parents, owing to the cost of real estate in Alexandria. In recent years, he helped his mother care for his father. (While I was reporting this story, Pruitt\u2019s father died.) In effect, Pruitt\u2014the person who has done more than anyone else to shape the English-language Wikipedia\u2014lives a life that is, by most outward measures, unremarkable.<\/p>\n

According to public tallies, Pruitt has made more than six million edits to Wikipedia and created more than thirty thousand articles. He is widely regarded as the most prolific Wikipedian in the entire world. (\u201cIt depends on how you\u2019re counting,\u201d he said. \u201cDifferent tools count different things.\u201d) In 2017, Time<\/em> magazine included him on its list of the most influential people on the internet. But outside of a small circle of editors, researchers, and obsessive readers on Wikipedia, the recognition has barely registered.<\/p>\n

On the site, he is known by his username, Ser Amantio di Nicolao\u2014a reference to a minor character in \u201cGianni Schicchi,\u201d Giacomo Puccini\u2019s comic opera. Pruitt\u2019s interest in opera is genuine, but the flourish is misleading. He avoids drama, which means that he avoids writing Wikipedia biographies of people who are still alive, whenever possible. \u201cI generally don\u2019t do a lot in the realm of current events,\u201d he told me. \u201cNot just because the stakes are too high but sometimes because there\u2019s so much editing going on on a subject in a particular moment that it can take me five or ten minutes just to break in with one edit.\u201d He prefers biographies of what he calls \u201cfairly obscure dead people.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

\u201cThey\u2019re settled,\u201d he explained.<\/p>\n

In 2001, Jimmy Wales, an internet entrepreneur, and Larry Sanger, a philosopher, launched Wikipedia as an experiment in collaborative knowledge creation, allowing anyone with an internet connection to contribute. Pruitt first encountered the site in 2003, when he was still in college. \u201cI didn\u2019t quite understand what it was,\u201d he recalled.<\/p>\n

For more than a year, he did not edit at all. He would stumble upon Wikipedia pages through search results or links, and then move on. Between late 2004 and early 2005, though, his relationship to the site began to change. The encyclopedia had reached what he described as a critical mass: \u201cThere was enough stuff on the site that there was always something to do,\u201d he said. \u201cBut it wasn\u2019t just a blank slate.\u201d The difference mattered. A completely empty encyclopedia was intimidating; a partially filled one invited correction and expansion.<\/p>\n

Some of Pruitt\u2019s first contributions were related to niche aspects of the Revolutionary War, including an entry on one of his own ancestors, a relatively obscure soldier from Virginia. He wrote several articles on topics and figures\u2014such as Francis Salvador, the first Jew to be killed in the Revolutionary War\u2014that would have been unlikely to appear in a traditional encyclopedia, and he watched, with a kind of amazement, as they remained, becoming permanent parts of the internet. \u201cAt this point, it\u2019s over twenty years,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Pruitt was actively editing during Wikipedia\u2019s first major growth spurt. In 2006, its English-language edition reached a million articles, a milestone that signalled both scale and legitimacy. (Wikipedia now exists in an estimated three hundred and forty-six languages, with the English edition containing the most entries.) As the site became bigger and more prominent, expectations hardened. Editing became less about authorship and more about stewardship. \u201cEven if an article looks complete, honestly, it isn\u2019t ever really complete,\u201d Pruitt said. Every page existed in a state of provisionality, open to revision and dispute.<\/p>\n

Over time, Pruitt\u2019s work shifted away from creating new articles and toward improving existing ones. He standardized categories, repaired references, and corrected small errors before they crystallized into misinformation. He has still seen some of those errors migrate elsewhere on the internet. \u201cYou fix something,\u201d he said, \u201cand then you\u2019ll see it show up years later somewhere else.\u201d<\/p>\n

Today, much of Pruitt\u2019s work is made possible by a specialized editing tool called AutoWikiBrowser. It allows experienced users to make rapid, semi-automated edits across large numbers of articles, flagging common problems and applying standardized fixes. Pruitt uses it to revise at a scale that wouldn\u2019t be possible by analog means: correcting dates, repairing broken links, standardizing citations, and cleaning up formatting across thousands of pages. Despite the name, \u201cit\u2019s not automatic,\u201d he said. \u201cYou still have to review every edit.\u201d The tool does not write articles or make judgments. It accelerates maintenance.<\/p>\n

As I perched next to Pruitt in his den, he turned to the computer and began doing what he calls \u201cmass editing.\u201d He opened up a web-based external tool known as PetScan, which generates lists of Wikipedia articles by category, allowing him to layer categories the way a researcher might combine search terms. \u201cWomen scientists\u201d crossed with \u201c19th-century physicists,\u201d for example, produces a list of biographies that fit both criteria, revealing pages that might be missing a relevant classification.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

The method depends on intersections. Categories are layered together until they produce a set of pages that can be worked through in sequence. Too broad, and the list becomes unusable; too narrow, and it returns almost nothing. After Pruitt ran the query for \u201c19th-century women physicists,\u201d a list of articles appeared. From there, he moved quickly. He opened a biography and checked whether it had been categorized correctly. In some cases, an article about a nineteenth-century woman physicist had been tagged as a scientist but not as a physicist. Many entries required only small corrections; others needed more substantive changes. The work consisted of small decisions made in rapid succession, each one nudging the encyclopedia closer to order.<\/p>\n

Wikipedia\u2019s hierarchy is deliberately difficult to see. Editors work under pseudonyms. Articles appear collectively authored. There are no bylines, no salaries, no masthead. Pruitt was granted administrative privileges, after another editor nominated him through Wikipedia\u2019s standard Request for Adminship process, where the editing community supported his candidacy. These privileges allow him to block users and close discussions, but he is careful about what that power does and does not mean. Wikipedia discourages editors from reverting\u2014\u201cundoing\u201d\u2014one another more than three times, regardless of correctness. \u201cYou can be blocked for twenty-four hours,\u201d he said. \u201cIt doesn\u2019t matter if you\u2019re right.\u201d He likes the rule. \u201cIt keeps things from turning personal.\u201d<\/p>\n

Inside Wikipedia, reputation accrues through time rather than visibility, and it \u201ccomes as much from longevity as anything else,\u201d Pruitt said. \u201cYou stick around. People know you.\u201d<\/p>\n

Among the people who stick around\u2014and who make consistent contributions to the site\u2014are the Wiki-obsessives known colloquially as \u201csuper editors.\u201d These individuals are responsible for hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of edits. Although there are more than a hundred and thirty-two million registered accounts on Wikipedia, a study found that one per cent of these users are responsible for roughly eighty per cent of the site\u2019s content.<\/p>\n

Justin Knapp\u2014a forty-three-year-old in Indiana who has held all sorts of jobs, including working at a pizzeria and at a crisis hotline\u2014is one super editor. In 2012, he became the first person to surpass a million edits on the English-language Wikipedia, before Pruitt surpassed him in total edit count a few years later. Knapp told me that he doesn\u2019t see Pruitt as a rival. \u201cIt\u2019s not competition,\u201d he said. \u201cWe\u2019re collaborators. We\u2019re colleagues.\u201d Asked whether editors are motivated by metrics at all, Knapp was unequivocal: \u201cI really don\u2019t think the kind of person who sets about to spend his free time writing an encyclopedia is really the kind of person who cares a lot about being a big fish in a small pond.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

That ethos\u2014low ego, high volume\u2014helps explain how the site functions. Both Pruitt and Knapp described Wikipedia less as a platform than as an ongoing negotiation among strangers. Editors co\u00f6rdinate through talk pages\u2014discussion threads attached to every article, some of which run for years. Disputes accumulate on talk pages over phrasing, sourcing, whether a subject belongs at all, with many never resolving. A finished Wikipedia page reflects a momentary consensus, subject to revision as soon as someone decides to revisit it.<\/p>\n

Read more Memorandum from the National Review Committee for National Day Designations<\/a><\/p>\n

A Wikipedia page\u2019s internal debates often center on matters far removed from public controversies. \u201cThe most contested topics within Wikipedia are not things about the broader culture wars,\u201d Wales, the site\u2019s co-founder, wrote in an e-mail. \u201cOf course there are difficult topics in the world, but most of the work isn\u2019t about that. We have robust debates about even very obscure matters. That isn\u2019t a problem. It\u2019s what it means to be Wikipedia.\u201d<\/p>\n

Those debates unfold under unusual conditions. Anonymity shapes that process. Because editors generally operate under pseudonyms, an argument succeeds not on the strength of someone\u2019s credentials or professional status but on its evidence and adherence to Wikipedia\u2019s policies. Authority emerges slowly, through repeated participation. \u201cYou can\u2019t force it,\u201d Knapp said. \u201cYou earn it by being there.\u201d<\/p>\n

Pruitt is not known for winning disputes or shaping consensus through argument; he is known for his persistence. He fixes things quietly, avoids unnecessary fights, and doggedly returns to issues within an article that others have left behind. As Knapp said, \u201cI think everyone agrees he\u2019s a nice guy and does valuable things and is useful.\u201d His scale of activity might suggest a certain level of influence over the site\u2014he has altered millions of English-language Wikipedia articles\u2014but the reality is more complicated. Wales wrote, \u201cI just looked and this morning in the space of one minute he made 25 edits to remove a deprecated template parameter. He looks on pace to do hundreds of those in a day or two. That\u2019s incredibly important, but hardly represents any sort of undue influence.\u201d<\/p>\n

That\u2019s not to say that Pruitt doesn\u2019t command an enormous amount of respect in the Wikipedia community. \u201cWe think of him as our No. 1 in amount of edits,\u201d Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight, another super editor, told me. Stephenson-Goodknight, who is seventy-two years old, began editing Wikipedia in 2007, after looking up a defunct American publisher whose books she collected. \u201cI thought there\u2019d be a Wikipedia article,\u201d she said. \u201cAnd there wasn\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n

Stephenson-Goodknight remembers double-checking the spelling of her search term. Nothing appeared. \u201cIt was that moment of clarity,\u201d she said. \u201cThere is no Santa Claus. Mom and Dad are not infallible. Wikipedia does not have an article about everything.\u201d So she decided to write one. \u201cI started the article on Book League of America,\u201d she said. \u201cAnd it\u2019s still there.\u201d<\/p>\n

Within a week or two, she wrote another. Then another. \u201cI was hooked,\u201d she explained. \u201cIt was like I was born to do this. There was just something about this researching and writing that just felt like it was<\/em> me.\u201d By 2014, she had become a super editor. Then, in December of that year, an academic paper quantified what editors like Stephenson-Goodknight had long suspected: just 15.53 per cent of English-language Wikipedia biographies were about women. A few months later, Stephenson-Goodknight launched a project called Women in Red, named for the red links that mark missing articles. The project focussed on creating Wikipedia articles about notable women. It has since produced hundreds of thousands of new entries.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

In 2021, Stephenson-Goodknight was elected to the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation, a position that she held through late 2024. Her tenure coincided with a fundamental shift in the role that Wikipedia plays on the internet. As the site entered its third decade, and artificial-intelligence algorithms grew hungry for data to learn on, Wikipedia articles were no longer just read; they were scraped, summarized, licensed, and folded into systems designed to answer questions elsewhere. In other words, Wikipedia had become infrastructure.<\/p>\n

Pruitt was vaguely aware of the change before he fully grasped its implications. \u201cFriends in tech would mention it,\u201d he recalled. \u201cThey\u2019d say, \u2018You know Wikipedia is being used for this now.\u2019\u00a0\u201d He did not follow developments in A.I. closely. \u201cI don\u2019t understand half of what Silicon Valley does,\u201d he said. What he does understand well is reference works.<\/p>\n

In October, 2025, when Elon Musk\u2019s company xAI launched Grokipedia, an A.I.-generated encyclopedia that is often compared to Wikipedia, Pruitt approached it the way he would any new compendium. He searched for articles on subjects he knew well, such as nineteenth-century opera singers. \u201cThey weren\u2019t there,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

But what unsettled him was not what was missing from Grokipedia but what was slightly off. \u201cNothing was exactly wrong, but it was just less right than I would have made it,\u201d Pruitt said. He described reading an entry that repurposed information from Wikipedia while subtly distorting it. In one instance, the entry summarized part of a person\u2019s life in a way that struck him as careless, describing a seven-year period as \u201cbrief.\u201d \u201cI don\u2019t think that\u2019s brief,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

The problem, as Pruitt saw it, was not the errors themselves\u2014there are plenty of mistakes on Wikipedia\u2014but rather where the responsibility for those errors lay. \u201cWikipedia can be fixed,\u201d he said. Errors are corrected publicly, and editors can debate them. Responsibility is shared, and each edit can be traced. Grokipedia, on the other hand, and A.I.-generated information more broadly, obscured the information-gathering process. It generated text that sounded authoritative without revealing exactly how it arrived there. \u201cIt sounds<\/em> right,\u201d he said. \u201cAnd that\u2019s worse.\u201d<\/p>\n

Inside Wikipedia, the response was pragmatic. Editors clarified existing policy. The use of large language models to generate contributions or rewrite content became grounds for blocking users. The decision wasn\u2019t simply ideological. \u201cYou can\u2019t collaborate with something that doesn\u2019t take responsibility,\u201d Pruitt said. Responsibility, on Wikipedia, meant that every edit was logged, every disagreement archived, every change reversible.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Still, Wikipedia\u2019s ban on A.I. doesn\u2019t mean that A.I. is prevented from reusing content on Wikipedia. Multiple A.I. companies have acknowledged that they rely on Wikipedia as a source of training data and reference material, citing its scale and accessibility. The site\u2019s content is openly available under a Creative Commons license, a feature long intended to encourage educational reuse but one that also made it especially legible to automated systems. Wikipedia became a foundational text for machine-learning models designed to summarize and answer questions using information drawn from other online sources. Analyses of A.I. outputs suggest that Wikipedia accounts for roughly a quarter of cited sources, according to data compiled by Semrush, a search-optimization company, with the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit that hosts Wikipedia, announcing earlier this year that Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Mistral AI, and Perplexity had joined its commercial service for large-scale access to Wikimedia data.<\/p>\n

Wales, Wikipedia\u2019s co-founder, doesn\u2019t see this as a big change in the way that the site was already functioning. In his view, the relationship between Wikipedia and the broader information ecosystem has always been cyclical rather than hierarchical. \u201cWikipedia informs journalists who then inform billions of people,\u201d he wrote. \u201cWikipedia informs academics who then inform billions of people. And the journalists and academics (and artists and poets and everyone else!) inform Wikipedia. We\u2019ve always been a layer.\u201d<\/p>\n

For Wales, the central question is how<\/em> A.I. is used. \u201cThe key for me is \u2018human in the loop,\u2019\u00a0\u201d he wrote. \u201cIf you use AI in your work, that can be good or bad\u2014it\u2019s up to you to do it well. We don\u2019t believe that at the current time, AI is anywhere good enough to directly write for Wikipedia without very careful human oversight.\u201d<\/p>\n

Midway through Wikipedia\u2019s twenty-fifth year, the site remains dependent on human volunteers: editors like Pruitt, who are willing to spend thousands of hours making meticulous changes, and who insist that they could stop at any time. \u201cI could,\u201d Pruitt told me\u2014stop, that is. \u201cIf I wanted to.\u201d The statement wasn\u2019t defiant; it was matter-of-fact. \u2666<\/p>\n

Read more One and No One<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Carson Griffith writes about Scott Pruitt, the most prolific super editor on Wikipedia, and the A.I. companies that lack the online encyclopedia\u2019s human touch.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1144,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1145","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-lede"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Accidental Architect of the Internet\u2019s Brain - City Relocation News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Accidental Architect of the Internet\u2019s Brain - City Relocation News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Carson Griffith writes about Scott Pruitt, the most prolific super editor on Wikipedia, and the A.I. companies that lack the online encyclopedia\u2019s human touch.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"City Relocation News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-30T17:44:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"15 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=1145#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=1145\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/3e7ce0c0c60d21e12a5ac61fb2b786d4\"},\"headline\":\"The Accidental Architect of the Internet\u2019s Brain\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-30T17:44:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=1145\"},\"wordCount\":2935,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=1145#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/717a855ab1c41f13a289abd586109ceb.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"The Lede\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=1145#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=1145\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=1145\",\"name\":\"The Accidental Architect of the Internet\u2019s Brain - City Relocation News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=1145#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=1145#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/717a855ab1c41f13a289abd586109ceb.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-30T17:44:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/3e7ce0c0c60d21e12a5ac61fb2b786d4\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=1145#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=1145\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=1145#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/717a855ab1c41f13a289abd586109ceb.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/717a855ab1c41f13a289abd586109ceb.webp\",\"width\":1280,\"height\":720},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=1145#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Accidental Architect of the Internet\u2019s Brain\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"City Relocation News\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/3e7ce0c0c60d21e12a5ac61fb2b786d4\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Accidental Architect of the Internet\u2019s Brain - City Relocation News","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Accidental Architect of the Internet\u2019s Brain - City Relocation News","og_description":"Carson Griffith writes about Scott Pruitt, the most prolific super editor on Wikipedia, and the A.I. companies that lack the online encyclopedia\u2019s human touch.","og_url":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145","og_site_name":"City Relocation News","article_published_time":"2026-07-30T17:44:57+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"15 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/3e7ce0c0c60d21e12a5ac61fb2b786d4"},"headline":"The Accidental Architect of the Internet\u2019s Brain","datePublished":"2026-07-30T17:44:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145"},"wordCount":2935,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/717a855ab1c41f13a289abd586109ceb.webp","articleSection":["The Lede"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145","url":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145","name":"The Accidental Architect of the Internet\u2019s Brain - City Relocation News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/717a855ab1c41f13a289abd586109ceb.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-30T17:44:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/3e7ce0c0c60d21e12a5ac61fb2b786d4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/717a855ab1c41f13a289abd586109ceb.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/717a855ab1c41f13a289abd586109ceb.webp","width":1280,"height":720},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=1145#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Accidental Architect of the Internet\u2019s Brain"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/","name":"City Relocation News","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/3e7ce0c0c60d21e12a5ac61fb2b786d4","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com"],"url":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1145","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1145"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1145\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1144"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1145"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1145"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1145"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}