{"id":139,"date":"2026-05-21T11:05:37","date_gmt":"2026-05-21T11:05:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139"},"modified":"2026-05-21T11:05:37","modified_gmt":"2026-05-21T11:05:37","slug":"clarence-thomas-against-progressivism-and-progressives","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139","title":{"rendered":"Clarence Thomas Against Progressivism\u2014and Progressives"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

During his confirmation hearings, in 1991, Justice Clarence Thomas employed an arresting image to assure senators that he would be an impartial jurist. Taking the bench means \u201chaving to strip down, like a runner, to eliminate agendas, to eliminate ideologies,\u201d Thomas said. \u201cIt is an amazing process, because that is precisely what you start doing. You start putting the speeches away, you start putting the policy statements away.\u201d Earlier this month, the seventy-seven-year-old Thomas became the second-longest-serving Justice in history, surpassing John Paul Stevens, who retired after thirty-four years, in 2010. If Thomas remains on the bench until May 20, 2028\u2014and he shows no signs of leaving\u2014he will outlast the record set by William O. Douglas, who stepped down from the Court after thirty-six years, in 1975. But Thomas long ago left his runner analogy in the dust\u2014and he has not exactly put away the speeches. A few weeks before eclipsing Stevens\u2019s record, he delivered a revealing\u2014and, to many who heard it, unsettling and ahistorical\u2014lecture on what should have been an uncontroversial topic: the two-hundred-and-fiftieth anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.<\/p>\n

Read more The Missing Bride of Anqoun<\/a><\/p>\n

Speaking at the University of Texas at Austin, at the invitation of its new School of Civic Leadership, part of a wave of conservative-inflected entities being created at public universities in Republican states, Thomas sounded themes that have been woven through his jurisprudence: that God bestowed the \u201ccertain unalienable rights\u201d of the Declaration, and that government serves merely to implement them. Dissenting in the 2015 case Obergefell v. Hodges, which found a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, Thomas complained that the majority \u201crejects the idea\u2014captured in our Declaration of Independence\u2014that human dignity is innate and suggests instead that it comes from the Government.\u201d In his Texas speech, Thomas expanded on that idea. \u201cNone of our rights come from the government,\u201d he said. \u201cIt is the Declaration that announces the ends of government. The Constitution achieves this purpose by protecting our natural rights and our liberties from concentrated power and excessive democracy.\u201d<\/p>\n

Some of Thomas\u2019s critique appeared to be aimed at weak-willed conservatives, including his fellow-Justices, for being, as Thomas perceives it, too spineless to stand up for the ideals enshrined in the Declaration. \u201cThey get so swept up in the euphoria of acclamation and acceptance that they put aside their convictions. They water down their message, negotiate against themselves, vote against their principles, and hide in the tall grass,\u201d Thomas said. \u201cThey recast themselves as institutionalists, pragmatists, or thoughtful moderates, all as a way of justifying their failures to themselves, their consciences, and their country.\u201d He continued, \u201cIt did not take me long, in Washington, to stop wondering why the Supreme Court took sixty years to overrule Plessy v. Ferguson, the 1896 decision that endorsed government-enforced racial segregation and validated the Jim Crow South that I grew up in.\u201d The Justices must have known that \u201cPlessy was a hideous wrong,\u201d he said, but \u201cthey may have been afraid of losing their social standing. They may have been afraid of bad press.\u201d To hear the bitterness in these words is to wonder, Will the end of this Supreme Court term reveal another instance of conservatives falling short of where Thomas believes they should go?<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Thomas, in a shout-out that he surely knew would irritate his liberal critics, welcomed two of those in attendance at the lecture, \u201cour dear friends Harlan and Kathy Crow.\u201d (In 2023, ProPublica<\/em> reported that Thomas had failed to disclose lavish vacations funded by Harlan Crow, and the sale of his mother\u2019s home to Crow.) But the Justice reserved his most incendiary remarks for progressives and Progressivism, the early twentieth-century reform movement that sought to harness government to counter corporate power. In Thomas\u2019s telling, \u201cProgressivism seeks to replace the basic premises of the Declaration of Independence and hence our form of government. It holds that our rights and our dignities come not from God but from government.\u201d Progressivism, he said, \u201cwas the first mainstream American political movement\u2014with the possible exception of the pro-slavery reactionaries on the eve of the Civil War\u2014to openly oppose the principles of the Declaration.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Thomas singled out Woodrow Wilson\u2014a political scientist, a Progressive, and a Southern Democrat, who, as President, from 1913 to 1921, segregated the civil service and helped create the modern bureaucratic state, including the Federal Reserve and the Federal Trade Commission. \u201cTo Wilson, the unalienable rights of the individual were, quote, a lot of nonsense,\u201d Thomas said. \u201cWilson redefined liberty not as a natural right attendant and antecedent to the government but as, quote, the right of those who are governed to adjust government to their own needs and interests.\u201d Wilson, Thomas said, \u201cdescribed America still stuck with its original system of government as, quote, slow to see the superiority of the European system,\u201d and saw the public as \u201cselfish, ignorant, timid, stubborn, and foolish.\u201d<\/p>\n

Thomas went on to link Progressivism to the worst crimes of the twentieth century. \u201cThe European system that Wilson and the Progressives scolded Americans for not adopting, which he called nearly perfect, led to the governments that caused the most awful century that the world has ever seen. Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, and Mao all were intertwined with the rise of Progressivism, and all were opposed to the natural rights on which our Declaration are based,\u201d Thomas said. \u201cMany Progressives expressed admiration for each of them shortly before their governments killed tens of millions of people.\u201d He warned that the danger of Progressivism persists to this day: \u201cSince Wilson\u2019s Presidency, Progressivism has made many inroads into our system of government and our way of life. It has coexisted uneasily with the principles of the Declaration. Because it is opposed to those principles, it is not possible for the two to coexist forever.\u201d<\/p>\n

Thomas\u2019s account of Progressivism as a malign force threatening individual liberty echoes an argument developed by scholars at the conservative Claremont Institute. When I asked Charles Kesler, a senior fellow at the institute and the editor of the Claremont Review of Books<\/em>, about the significance of Thomas\u2019s address, he invoked Abraham Lincoln\u2019s in 1858, on the existential stakes for a nation riven by slavery. \u201cThis is really Thomas\u2019s, in a strange way, his \u2018house divided\u2019 speech,\u201d Kesler told me. \u201cHe doesn\u2019t expect the Union to fall, but he doesn\u2019t expect it to remain half slave and half free permanently. It will become all one or all the other.\u201d Ronald Pestritto, also a senior fellow at Claremont and the graduate dean at Hillsdale College, wrote in praise of Thomas\u2019s speech: \u201cThe Left doesn\u2019t want us to notice that they predicate their core governing vision on a rejection of America\u2019s founding principles, and so they are bound to protest Thomas\u2019s account. Yet his account is dead-on accurate, and for proof one need only look to the original Progressives, who were open in their disdain of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. In this, they were far more honest than their present-day cousins.\u201d<\/p>\n

Numerous scholars of the Progressive Era with whom I spoke said Thomas had offered up a distorted version of the movement. Nancy Unger, a past president of the Society for Historians of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era and a professor emerita at Santa Clara University, said, \u201cProgressives were not perfect, and I don\u2019t pretend that they were, but this is such a misrepresentation of who they were. The driving force for most Progressives was not that they were anti-American, not that they were anti-Declaration of Independence and Constitution, but that they were saying, \u2018Look, this is a different nation than when we started, we\u2019re an industrial, urban nation, and a lot of things that didn\u2019t require government before do so now.\u2019 So to turn that into some kind of vilification, I just think, is unconscionable.\u201d Christopher Nichols, a historian of the Progressive Era at the Ohio State University, said of Thomas\u2019s account, \u201cIt\u2019s a deeply problematic reduction of Progressivism to its most negative elements,\u201d including racism and support for eugenics. Thomas\u2019s speech, Nichols continued, \u201cabsolutely mistakes and conflates figures like Stalin and Hitler and Mussolini as Progressives, none of whom would have defined themselves as such, or were defined in their eras as such.\u201d<\/p>\n

As Matt Ford noted in The New Republic<\/em>, Wilson offers a convenient target, given an ugly record of racism that led Princeton, in 2020, to remove his name from the public-policy school, as an \u201cinappropriate namesake.\u201d But Thomas\u2019s focus on Wilson misrepresents his role in the Progressive movement. \u201cPresenting Wilson as the inventor of progressivism is historically illiterate, akin to saying that Joseph Stalin invented communism or that Ronald Reagan invented conservatism,\u201d Ford wrote. (Thomas never mentioned Wilson\u2019s Progressive predecessor, Theodore Roosevelt, a Republican.) In addition, as John Milton Cooper, Jr., the author of a 2009 biography of Wilson, pointed out, Thomas overstated Wilson\u2019s rejection of natural rights. \u201cThink of this deeply, thoughtfully, intellectually religious man not believing in natural rights\u2014come on, you can\u2019t believe that,\u201d Cooper told me. Wilson\u2019s father was a Presbyterian minister, and Wilson read the Bible daily.<\/p>\n

Read more A Booming Shadow Market of Sketchy A.I. Investments<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Thomas\u2019s indictment of Wilson rests on a tendentious interpretation of his writings and speeches. Wilson did use the word \u201cnonsense\u201d in relation to unalienable rights, but nowhere near as dismissively as Thomas claims. \u201cNo doubt a great deal of nonsense has been talked about the inalienable rights of the individual, and a great deal that was mere vague sentiment and pleasing speculation has been put forward as fundamental principle,\u201d Wilson wrote. But his point was not to diminish individual rights; it was to elevate their importance. \u201cThe individual,\u201d he continues, \u201cis indisputably the original, the first fact of liberty. Nations are made up of individuals, and the dealings of government with individuals are the ultimate and perfect test of its constitutional character. A man is not free through representative assemblies, he is free in his own action, in his own dealings with the persons and powers about him, or he is not free at all.\u201d<\/p>\n

Far from scorning the Declaration, Wilson praised it as a \u201cgreat document,\u201d undergirded by the \u201cassertion that men have always the right to determine for themselves\u201d whether their government is being run in a way \u201clikely to effect their safety and happiness.\u201d He cautioned against an emphasis on its soaring preamble\u2014\u201cthe rhetorical introduction,\u201d he said in a 1911 speech, \u201cis the least part of it\u201d\u2014 but only because he wanted to insist that modern-day Americans focus on the grievances of their own era. \u201cHow are we going to realize the conceptions of the author of the Declaration of Independence in our own day?\u201d he asked.<\/p>\n

Wilson pointed to nineteenth-century German architects of government reform, whose expertise in bureaucratic management he admired. But he advised that their system could not easily be transplanted to the United States. \u201cWe should not like to have had Prussia\u2019s history for the sake of having Prussia\u2019s administrative skill; and Prussia\u2019s particular system of administration would quite suffocate us,\u201d he wrote in an 1887 essay, \u201cThe Study of Administration.\u201d \u201cIt is better to be untrained and free than servile and systematic.\u201d Wilson did speak condescendingly of the public, but his larger point was that the people needed to be educated and convinced of the imperative for reform. \u201cWherever regard for public opinion is a first principle of government, practical reform must be slow and all reform must be full of compromises,\u201d he wrote. \u201cFor wherever public opinion exists it must rule.\u201d<\/p>\n

Did Thomas take Wilson out of context? When I ticked through the various quotes with Kesler, he acknowledged that, at times, Thomas had perhaps offered a \u201cloose formulation,\u201d as in his assertion that Wilson viewed inalienable rights as \u201cnonsense.\u201d As to Thomas\u2019s most striking accusation, linking Progressives to Hitler, Stalin, and Mao, Kesler said, \u201cThis is also a bit of a loose formulation,\u201d adding that Thomas had \u201chooked together two things, which are not as intimately related as maybe he\u2019s asserting here.\u00a0.\u00a0.\u00a0. On the connection between the American progressive movement, even in its Wilsonian form, and fascism and communism, there\u2019s no vital connection, I would say.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Thomas\u2019s speech was, Kesler noted, an \u201cunusual Supreme Court Justice\u2019s speech.\u201d But it\u2019s appropriate and common for Justices to make speeches, and the public benefits from hearing their views\u2014even if some out-of-court comments have strayed too far into partisanship or vitriol. During the 2016 campaign, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg called Donald Trump a \u201cfaker\u201d and said she couldn\u2019t imagine \u201cwhat the country would be\u201d with him as President; Ginsburg quickly apologized for her \u201cill-advised\u201d comments. Last month, Justice Sonia Sotomayor took an undisguised swipe at Justice Brett Kavanaugh, although not by name, for his breezy dismissal of the burden imposed by what he called \u201ctypically brief\u201d questioning of citizens and people in the country legally by immigration officers. \u201cThis is from a man whose parents were professionals,\u201d she said, and who \u201cprobably doesn\u2019t really know any person who works by the hour.\u201d Sotomayor also apologized for her \u201churtful comments.\u201d<\/p>\n

Stephen Gillers, a legal-ethics expert and an emeritus professor of law at New York University, told me that, in his view, Thomas\u2019s speech did not cross any ethical lines. \u201cHe could be wrong historically, and it doesn\u2019t create a problem for him as a Justice under the new Supreme Court code,\u201d Gillers said. (In 2023, the Court adopted its first code of conduct, which permits Justices to give speeches on the legal system, among other topics.) Others were more critical. \u201cI thought this was the most inappropriate thing I\u2019ve ever seen a Supreme Court Justice say,\u201d Michael Klarman, a constitutional historian at Harvard Law School, told me. \u201cJustices are not supposed to be or appear to be anything but impartial. And I can\u2019t think of another example in American history where a Justice went and condemned the political views of tens of millions of Americans.\u201d Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of Berkeley Law, described the speech as \u201cjarring.\u201d Thomas, he said, has \u201ctaken what should be a unifying event for the country\u201d\u2014the two-hundred-and-fiftieth anniversary of the Declaration\u2014\u201cand tried to claim it for one side.\u201d<\/p>\n

Thomas has spent thirty-four years firmly anchored on the Court\u2019s right flank. When the Court eliminated the constitutional right to abortion, in 2022, Thomas complained that it had not gone far enough, and should jettison other decisions that relied on similar reasoning\u2014rulings that guaranteed access to contraception, struck down sodomy laws, and enshrined a right to same-sex marriage. In the Court\u2019s ruling on the Voting Rights Act last month, Thomas not only concurred in the majority\u2019s dismantling of a key section of the law that prohibits practices that have the effect of denying racial minorities the right to vote, he restated his iconoclastic view that the provision does not apply to districting. Last week, when the Court allowed continued access by mail to the abortion medication mifepristone, Thomas, who was one of only two dissenters (the other was Justice Samuel Alito), went so far as to assert that companies manufacturing the drug were engaged in a \u201ccriminal enterprise,\u201d in violation of the Comstock Act, an 1873 law that prohibits mailing any \u201carticle or thing designed, adapted, or intended for producing abortion.\u201d (The law was not at issue before the Justices.) More than any other Justice, Thomas is willing to overturn precedents when they collide with his originalist approach. But there is a difference between his expression of unflinching conservatism, on the bench and off, and his willingness, even his zeal, to condemn an entire political movement, one with more than historical interest. The first is jurisprudence, however extreme. The other veers into a political realm where judges, as Thomas once told us, have no business.\u00a0\u2666<\/p>\n

Read more A Republican Bloodbath in the Texas Senate Primary Is Giving Democrats Hope<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ruth Marcus on Clarence Thomas\u2019s recent speech, at the University of Texas, on the two-hundred-and-fiftieth anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":138,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-139","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-lede"],"yoast_head":"\nClarence Thomas Against Progressivism\u2014and Progressives - City Relocation News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Clarence Thomas Against Progressivism\u2014and Progressives - City Relocation News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Ruth Marcus on Clarence Thomas\u2019s recent speech, at the University of Texas, on the two-hundred-and-fiftieth anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"City Relocation News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-21T11:05:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=139#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=139\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/3e7ce0c0c60d21e12a5ac61fb2b786d4\"},\"headline\":\"Clarence Thomas Against Progressivism\u2014and Progressives\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-21T11:05:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=139\"},\"wordCount\":2686,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=139#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/870b36e2ccfe127e07ebe99d146472de.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"The Lede\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=139#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=139\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=139\",\"name\":\"Clarence Thomas Against Progressivism\u2014and Progressives - City Relocation News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=139#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=139#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/870b36e2ccfe127e07ebe99d146472de.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-21T11:05:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/3e7ce0c0c60d21e12a5ac61fb2b786d4\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=139#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=139\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=139#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/870b36e2ccfe127e07ebe99d146472de.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/870b36e2ccfe127e07ebe99d146472de.webp\",\"width\":1280,\"height\":720},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?p=139#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Clarence Thomas Against Progressivism\u2014and Progressives\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"City Relocation News\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/3e7ce0c0c60d21e12a5ac61fb2b786d4\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityrelocationnews.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Clarence Thomas Against Progressivism\u2014and Progressives - City Relocation News","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Clarence Thomas Against Progressivism\u2014and Progressives - City Relocation News","og_description":"Ruth Marcus on Clarence Thomas\u2019s recent speech, at the University of Texas, on the two-hundred-and-fiftieth anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.","og_url":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139","og_site_name":"City Relocation News","article_published_time":"2026-05-21T11:05:37+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/3e7ce0c0c60d21e12a5ac61fb2b786d4"},"headline":"Clarence Thomas Against Progressivism\u2014and Progressives","datePublished":"2026-05-21T11:05:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139"},"wordCount":2686,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/870b36e2ccfe127e07ebe99d146472de.webp","articleSection":["The Lede"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139","url":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139","name":"Clarence Thomas Against Progressivism\u2014and Progressives - City Relocation News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/870b36e2ccfe127e07ebe99d146472de.webp","datePublished":"2026-05-21T11:05:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/3e7ce0c0c60d21e12a5ac61fb2b786d4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/870b36e2ccfe127e07ebe99d146472de.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/870b36e2ccfe127e07ebe99d146472de.webp","width":1280,"height":720},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?p=139#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Clarence Thomas Against Progressivism\u2014and Progressives"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/","name":"City Relocation News","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/3e7ce0c0c60d21e12a5ac61fb2b786d4","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com"],"url":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=139"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/138"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityrelocationnews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}